Started this but will go back to read the rest later, I liked it so much I told my husband about it— we had a debate about banning swimming in public areas where people frequently drown and it fits very well within that debate!
: 6 
: 1
| @Goldberry - Jan 22, 2023
Started this but will go back to read the rest later, I liked it so much I told my husband about it— we had a debate about banning swimming in public areas where people frequently drown and it fits very well within that debate! : 6 : 1
|
| @Crowd33 - Jan 22, 2023
Moral philosophy dictates what is right here, at least in the government coercion case, not a utilitarian cost benefit analysis. Banning people from taking drugs is a violation of their rights, thus it will cause more "invisible harm" than reduce visible harm : 5 : 0
|
| @Skknlover - Jan 22, 2023
My AdHd won’t let me read all that. : 8 : 2
|
| @chriscelaya - Jan 23, 2023 I have ADHD as well. Which is why I have ChatGPT summarize and explain things to me like I'm 5 years old. 😆 --ChatGPT--- Okay, so imagine you have two different types of toys, the good toys and the bad toys. The good toys are fun to play with and don't hurt anyone, but the bad toys can be dangerous and hurt people. Some people want to make sure that only the good toys are allowed to be played with, so they want to put rules in place to keep the bad toys away. But other people think that even though the bad toys are dangerous, we might find some new and exciting toys that we've never seen before if we let people play with all types of toys. It's like a trade-off, where you have to decide if it's more important to keep people safe from the bad toys or to let people try out new toys. : 7 : 1
|
| @1dolinski - Jan 22, 2023 ChatGPT tldr summary 🙌 In summary, the debate around censorship of ChatGPT, or any other technology, is a trade-off between visible harm and invisible harm. Decelerators prioritize reducing visible harm and believe that the damage done by "harmful use-cases" outweighs the benefit of "good use-cases." Accelerators prioritize reducing invisible harm and believe that more novel business models and use-cases outweigh the emergence of harmful use-cases. The difficulty in measuring invisible harm and a human bias to reduce visible harm to zero make it challenging to strike a balance between the two. Ultimately, it's a complex issue that requires careful consideration of both visible and invisible harms and a determination of which harm is more significant in the given context. : 5 : 2
|
| @Hengkitakeru12 - Jan 22, 2023
Excellent : 5 : 0
|
| @jeanhyperng - Jan 22, 2023
All of us must continue to attend upskilling programs in order to stay competitive in whatever industry we are in. The world is changing fast, and if we don't adapt, we'll get left behind. Investing in ourselves and our education is the key to success, whether you're in the tech industry, finance, or any other field. So don't be afraid to learn new skills, to push yourself out of your comfort zone, and to strive for greatness. Because that's what it takes to stay ahead in today's world. And remember, don't stop till you're at the top. : 4 : 1
|
| @Randhir - Jan 23, 2023
The problem is the invisible harm is not measurable accurately because it is tough to simulate how society will react in the long-term to easing of these regulations once people see others scam people and get away with it. Imagine an FTX-like Scam in the regular stock market happening every day because there were no regulations and say SBF gets away with it. How bad would it get? How many lives will be ruined forever? And because people saw one SBF get away with it or one rug-puller get away with it in Crypto, lot of others followed and the problem became so wide-spread. Maybe some AI will be built to run these scenarios, or we could try these scenarios in some countries/counties and then allow this to run across the country. : 5 : 1
|
| @DiamondThumb - Jan 23, 2023
deceptive. disrespectful. secretive. feels like a scam. anything not core is noise. #WhereIsSalilShah : 1 : 1
|
| @j03j - Jan 23, 2023
DeSo has made me really consider the value of the internet full stop. Pause and read this. Come up with your own list as well. "this degeneracy is worth tolerating because it means we also get instant messaging, Amazon, food delivery services, telehealth, and other unambiguously valuable use-cases." Can anyone make the case for the internet as we know it? : 3 : 1
|