Feedback:
- I think it is incredibly important for a social token series to define both what they are and what they aren't. You do this well in the start with both a definition and that they are not the same as DAO tokens.
- There is a bit of contradictory wording when you say that fundamentally there are two types of social tokens, fungible and non-fungible tokens. But then go on to mention how they are distinct and have two separate sections - one for NFTs and one describing social tokens as fungible.
- In the organizational social token section you mention that you perceive them as higher risk because organizations can come and go but human identities cannot. Does that mean that you are thinking about individual social tokens being mapped to one human and pseudonymous social tokens are something different? Also besides nascent organizations most don't just "come and go" often and don't have the same key person risk issues to worry about(as much as individuals).
: 4 
: 0
| @BenErsing - Nov 06, 2022 Thank you, Darian. Very helpful feedback. Will incorporate. : 2 : 0
|